A senior man reads with a young boy.

Study Finds Ageism Interventions Do Change Attitudes

Bethesda Health | October 16, 2019

The World Health Organization says that ageism is the most socially acceptable prejudice in the world and deems it such a serious public health threat that it commissioned studies on five aspects of it. One of these studies set out to determine whether ageism interventions can actually change people’s attitudes and reduce ageism.

Researchers at Cornell University and the University of Toronto performed an exhaustive meta-analysis entitled “Interventions to Reduce Ageism against Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” to see if anti-ageism methods work.

Meta-analyses combine data from many independent studies of the same subject to determine overall trends. These provide powerful insights that single studies alone cannot prove and give researchers more confidence in the results because they are based on many studies, not just a standalone.

The WHO notes that ageism is usually unchallenged due to its largely implicit and subconscious nature. Because of this, it’s entirely possible for people to be ageist without knowing it. (The WHO has a nine-question quiz so you can rate your own ageism.)

This bias can wreak havoc with older adults’ health. For example, if physicians harbor ageist attitudes, they may dismiss, undertreat, or overtreat patients with unnecessary screening or medication.

If ageism is internalized among older people, they may die earlier. According to a study by Yale University psychologist Becca R. Levy, who was also one of Next Avenue’s 2016 Influencers in Aging, people with positive self-perceptions of aging lived 7.5 years longer than people who had negative attitudes.

How the Study Was Conducted

Ageism was first defined by gerontologist Dr. Robert Butler in the late 1960s, so the meta-analysis included studies conducted between 1976 and 2018. To be included in the meta-analysis, a study had to evaluate a specific program designed to reduce ageism and had to include a control group (so one group received some form of intervention and the other didn’t).

After combing through 29,702 published studies on ageism, and excluding methodologically weak studies, the scholars were left with 63 studies that met the criteria for rigorous research. They were simply searching for studies on ageism, not choosing the strategies that were employed.

The scientists found three types of interventions that successfully reduced ageism:

The interventions took many different formats. Some were one-day workshops; others lasted six to eight weeks. Because the meta-analysis grouped broadly similar interventions, such as education and contact with older adults, no single study could be pointed out as more effective than another.

“We can’t tell you if having kindergartner and older adults taking care of pets together is better than having kindergartners and older adults playing games together,” says study co-author Karl Pillemer, professor of gerontology at Weill Cornell Medicine and senior associate dean for research and outreach in Cornell’s College of Human Ecology. “The finding of the study is that a wide variety of (educational, intergenerational or mixed) programs work, so people can adapt them to their own needs.”

The authors noted that further research examining the effects of ageism on older adults is crucial, given the evidence of internalized ageism among older adults.

The Surprising Results of Ageism Interventions

Ageism is a big problem, and the researchers wondered if small-scale programs and ageism interventions could really make an impact. Pillemer notes that the results of the study were unexpectedly promising.

“Our biggest surprise was how effective these programs are. The usual hypothesis in starting a study like this is that the programs won’t have an effect,” he says. However, “The takeaway message is that well-designed programs to improve attitudes toward older adults and reduce negative attitudes really work,” Pillemer adds.

As an extra benefit, the interventions were not highly expensive, large-scale, multi-year projects. They were relatively small and easy to implement.

“We ought to be using these programs, and they ought to be disseminated as widely as they can be,” Pillemer says. “They are that rare program that actually does what it says it will do. By offering education or contact with older adults — and especially both in the same program — you can move attitudes in a more positive direction and reduce stereotypes and prejudice.”

Added co-author David Burnes, associated professor and associate dean in the Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work at the University of Toronto: “These interventions were particularly effective with adolescents and younger adults, so if you teach them at a younger age, that will presumably have longer-term impact.”

At Bethesda, we understand the importance of treating every individual with the respect that they deserve. Continue reading for more intergenerational activity ideas, caregiver tips, and health and wellness articles for older adults like these.

By Deborah Quilter for Next Avenue.

© Next Avenue – 2018. All rights reserved.

Related Articles

COVID-19 has changed senior caregiving, but we're learning to adapt.

How COVID-19 Has Changed Senior Caregiving

The scope and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the susceptibility of seniors to its more serious consequences, has changed the way family caregivers… Read More

Peg Sharp, resident of Bethesda Gardens, has been exploring the world since she was a child, and she continues this mentality in her retirement.

Peg Sharp – Still Exploring the World at 108

Bethesda Gardens resident Peg Sharp was born April 3, 1910 — less than seven years after the Wright brothers’ first flew at Kitty Hawk,… Read More

Aging Gracefully & Living Life to the Fullest

My 15-year-old son Evan walked off the tennis court triumphantly, as if he had just won the U.S. Open. Up to that point, our… Read More

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.